CAMERAS Sony A7R III vs A9

Sony A7R III vs A9

-

Sony A7R III vs A9

Home CAMERAS Sony A7R III vs A9

Sony A7R III vs A9

High-ISO resolution comparison of the Sony Alpha 9 and Alpha 7R III: comparison of high and low resolution in full format at high ISO

The lower the resolution of a camera, the larger the pixels and the lower the noise. Thus, if one wants to photograph at high ISO sensitivities, one should not only take a camera with the largest possible image sensor, but also one with the lowest possible resolution. But is that really the case? We compared the two full-frame cameras Sony Alpha 9 (24 megapixels) and Sony Alpha 7R III (42 megapixels) once at high ISO sensitivities.

The Sony Alpha 9 is primarily designed for speed, with its full-frame sensor resolving “only” 24 megapixels. [Photo: Sony]

The comparison of the two mirrorless system cameras resulted from an internal discussion in the comments in this blog, and was therefore not made 1:1 against each other with the identical lens, as each of our readers where using different lens.

In our laboratory tests, we have been photographing a test image for quite some time, and we proceed as follows: The focal length and aperture combination with the highest resolution in the center of the image, determined in the test laboratory with the standard lens, is the basic setting of the camera, in which an ISO series is photographed in raw and JPEG in automatic aperture mode. With the Sony Alpha 9 and the Alpha 7R III these were different lenses. While the Alpha 9 used the Sony FE 24-70 mm F2.8 GM (SEL2470GM) at 41 millimetres with F4 as the upper class lens, the Alpha 7R III used the Sony FE 24-105 mm F4 G OSS (SEL24105G) at 24 millimetres with F8 as the middle class lens. That the Sony Alpha 7R III would be advantaged by the lens can’t be said to be so.

A first hint that the Sony Alpha 9, despite the lower sensor resolution at higher ISO sensitivities than expected, isn’t better than the Alpha 7R III is provided by our “classic” laboratory test. There we measure the texture sharpness, whereby the DxO Analyzer does not determine a comparable absolute value here, because it does not depend on the sensor resolution, but calculates how many details are visible on a 60 x 40 centimeter photo at a viewing distance of 60 centimeters. This is of course a very theoretical value, but it works quite well if you know how to interpret the numbers. A value of 1 means that all expected details are visible. Values above 1 mean that sharpening has created artificial details that do not belong there, such as double contours. If the value falls below 1, details are missing, where about 0.9 is the threshold at which the images are felt to be sufficiently detailed. If the value falls below 0.8, details are visibly missing. You always have to compare the pictures from practice, because it happens that with identical values one camera subjectively performs a bit better than another. This is one of the reasons why we record an ISO series of test images as described in the first paragraph and evaluate them accordingly in our camera test reports.

The Sony Alpha 7R III, on the other hand, with its 42 megapixels resolution on the full-format sensor, is the current resolution record holder in the Sony E system. [Photo: Sony]

If you now compare the laboratory readings of the Sony Alpha 9 and 7R III (see diagrams below), then both cameras are up to ISO 6,400 at a value of over 1 and at ISO 12,800 still just over 0.9. But then it becomes exciting: The value drops steeply at the Alpha 9 above ISO 6,400, while the Alpha 7R III already catches itself again at ISO 12,800. Even at ISO 51.200, the Alpha 7R III is only slightly below 0.9, while the Alpha 9 drops significantly below 0.8. However, in the brightness noise in the laboratory test, the Alpha 9 has a clear advantage here, and this is quite exactly an ISO sensitivity level. This means that the brightness noise of the Alpha 7R III at ISO 25.600 is as strong as that of the Alpha 9 at ISO 51.200.

But what use are all the theoretical values, what does it look like in practice? Here we have chosen a picture at ISO 51.200, where according to the laboratory clear differences should be visible. Does the Alpha 7R III really show more details and in return is more noisy than the Alpha 9? What is practically relevant for the image impression? To compare the cameras, you can choose different approaches. Do you scale the Alpha 7R III image down or the Alpha 9 image up? We tried both, but the result was the same: purely subjectively, the Alpha 7R III wins quite clearly. It shows more detail and the noise is finer and less annoying. The image of the Alpha 9 looks much more detailed. Even if the images are reduced to six megapixels, so that the loss of detail of the Alpha 9 shouldn’t play a role anymore, the Alpha 7R III still shows the slightly better image, even if there are hardly any differences visible.

Comparison of the Alpha 9 (left) and Alpha 7R III (right) at ISO 51.200. The image of the Alpha 9 was scaled up to the resolution of the Alpha 7R III.

When comparing an specific image section in the image above, the Alpha 7R III shows much more structure in the hair of the doll, the eyelashes are still visible compared to the Alpha 9 and the dress also shows more structure. The 7R III shows a somewhat more aggressive noise, but that doesn’t really matter, because the picture simply looks much sharper overall. The fact that the images are exposed slightly differently is a peculiarity of the cameras, because both were operated in the automatic timer, as already mentioned above. The light source was the same. By the way, so that everyone can get their own picture, we have linked the original JPEG images from the cameras at ISO 6.400 and 51.200 in full resolution below. But beware: the ZIP file generated is about 75 megabytes in size.

By the way, the result does not look any different compared to an Alpha 7S, for example. At ISO 51.200, the noise is already clearly visible, but even less detailed than with the Alpha 9 or 7R III. Physically or optically, there is certainly a maximum somewhere in the current sensor technology where an increase in the sensor resolution no longer brings anything. For example, the APS-C camera has been stuck with a maximum sensor resolution of 24 megapixels for years, apart from the Samsung NX1, which is no longer available and which achieved 28 megapixels. With the Micro-Four-Thirds sensor, the maximum resolution is currently 20 megapixels, with the cameras showing hardly more resolution than with 16 megapixels, but also no more noise.

Who might be wondering what’s going on with Canon: Unlike Sony and Nikon, they use sensors from their own production instead of Sony’s, some of which lag significantly behind in performance at high ISO sensitivities. Thus, the Canon EOS 5DS R with its 50 megapixel sensor only reaches a maximum of ISO 12,800 and at ISO 6,400 shows about the same level of detail as the Sony Alpha 9 at ISO 51,200, despite its significantly higher resolution, which the 5DS R can only play at low sensitivities and then even surpasses a Sony Alpha 7R III. However, the EOS 5DS R is also over two years older than a Sony Alpha 7R III and so it remains to be hoped that Canon will perhaps bring models with improved sensor technology onto the market this year and thus be able to catch up to the competition even with higher ISO sensitivities.

Bottom line

If you have the choice, you should choose the higher sensor resolution, especially in full format. The prerequisites are the latest sensor technology and the latest image processing processors. A lower resolution only plays out its advantages when it comes to fast serial images and storage times, because the data volumes are smaller. But here, too, Sony and Nikon’s high-resolution cameras are now entering speed ranges that are “fast enough” for most applications. You should never forget the lens, because the sensor can’t image what it can’t resolve.

Which is newer Sony A9 or Sony A7R III

Sony A7R III is newer than the Sony A9. Sony A7R III was released in 2018 whereas Sony A9 was released in 2017.

Previous articleSony A7R III Review
Next articleNikon D7100 Review
Peter Dench
Peter Dench
I am Peter Dench. Digital Photographer, born in London 1972, currently living in Deerfield, near Chicago. I have numerous photography expositions and also working in model photography. In this website, PhotoPoint, I usually review cameras provided by local dealers in Illinois and by the manufacturers. Sometimes I, Peter Dench, review lenses too, but only when I have a suitable camera for them. Please let me know in the comments if I can improve any of these articles.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Nikon D100 Review

Nikon D100 Review Those who have always dreamed of continuing to use their existing Nikon equipment - and especially the...

Leica X Vario (Type 107) Review

Leica X Vario (Type 107) Review: Leica X Vario with APS-C sensor and zoom lens - New addition to...

Sealife DC2000 Review

Sealife DC2000 Review Underwater and outdoor cameras are rather marbled by the image results thanks to the very small image...

Nikon 1 AW1 Review: Waterproof and Shockproof Digital System Camera

Nikon 1 AW1 Review: Nikon 1 AW1 Waterproof and Shockproof Digital System Camera    Up to now, you could only take...

Canon PowerShot S110 Review

Canon PowerShot S110 Review The Canon PowerShot S110 is a WLAN camera with manual control and touch display optically zooms...

Panasonic Lumix FZ35 (FZ38) Review

Panasonic Lumix FZ35 (FZ38) Review Panasonic has accepted the challenge of its competitors and is sending the Lumix DMC-FZ35 (FZ38...

Nikon D4 Review

Nikon D4 Review: A Professional Model With Additional Features This is the review of the successful Nikon D4. The successor...

Canon Rebel SL3 Review (EOS 250D)

Canon Rebel SL3 Review (EOS 250D): Compact and lightweight - Now with 4K video and eye autofocus (Eye AF) The...

Panasonic ZS5 (Lumix DMC-TZ8) Review

Panasonic ZS5 (Lumix DMC-TZ8) Review For the Panasonic ZS5 (Panasonic Lumix TZ8 elsewhere) travel zoom camera, the bar was set...

Panasonic Lumix G1 Review

Panasonic Lumix G1 Review With the introduction of the Panasonic Lumix G1, Panasonic caused quite a stir with its "EVIL...

Sony a57 Review: System Camera With Ten Frames Per Second

Sony a57 Review (Sony Alpha SLT-A57): System Camera With Ten Frames Per Second With the introduction of the Sony a57,...

Fujifilm X-A7 Review

Fujifilm X-A7 Review: Fujifilm X-A7 entry-level model with extra-large touch screen introduced - Now with true 4K video capability The...

Nikon Coolpix P7800 Review: Just A Slightly Improved P7700

Nikon Coolpix P7800 Review: It Is Just An Improved P7700? This is the complete review of the Nikon Coolpix P7800....

Panasonic Lumix ZS10 Review (TZ20 / TZ22)

Panasonic Lumix ZS10 Review (TZ20 / TZ22) The range of super-zoom compact cameras is very dense, so manufacturers have to...

Sony a7R IV Review

Sony a7R IV review: Sony Alpha 7R IV with 61 Mpx- Mirrorless High-End Camera With the Sony a7R IV (Alpha...

Sony Alpha 6100 Review

Sony Alpha 6100 Review: Mirrorless APS-C system camera of the upper entry-level With the two new models, the Alpha 6100...

Sony Alpha 6600 Review

Sony Alpha 6600 Review: APS-C flagship camera Sony's new APS-C flagship model is the Sony Alpha 6600, which is the...

Sony a37 Review

Sony a37 Review The Sony SLT Alpha 37 (Sony a37 as it is known by photographers) is aimed at entry-level...

Sony RX0 II Review: Actioncam With Moving Display and Internal 4K Recording

Sony RX0 II Review:  Actioncam With Moving Display and Internal 4K Recording This is the review of the Sony RX0...

Nikon Z50 Review

Nikon Z50 Review: Mirrorless Nikon Z50 with APS-C sensor and lenses (16-50 and 50-250 mm) With the Nikon Z50, Nikon...

Canon EOS M6 Mark II Review

Canon EOS M6 Mark II Review With the Canon EOS M6 Mark II, Canon introduced a 32.5-megapixel resolution SLR system...

Canon EOS M200 Review

Canon EOS M200 Review: Canon EOS M200 for compact and affordable mirrorless entry - Now with 4K video and...

Olympus EM5 Mark III Review

Olympus EM5 Mark III Review: Olympus EM5 Mark III with 4K video and phase autofocus After the OM-D E-M1 X,...

Fujifilm FinePix X10 Review

Fujifilm FinePix X10 Review With the Fujifilm FinePix X10, Fujifilm combines classic design and high-quality workmanship with the concept of...

Olympus E10 Review

Olympus E10 Review Olympus is making public the new flagship among its digital cameras, which is the Olympus E10, revealing...

Sony Cybershot HX95 And HX99 Reviews

Sony CyberShot DSC-HX95 and HX99 with 24-720mm zoom: Two Similar Compact Travel Cameras With the two models Cybershot DSC-HX95 and...

Nikon Coolpix A Review

Nikon Coolpix A Review: Nikon Brings Nikon Coolpix A With A Large Image Sensor Nikon releases the Nikon Coolpix A...

Panasonic Lumix G95 (Lumix G90-G91) Review

Panasonic Lumix G95 (Lumix G90-G91) Review With the Panasonic Lumix G95 (Lumix G90 in the European Union and Britain,...

Samsung NX1000 Review

Samsung NX1000 Review This is the complete review of the Samsung NX1000. At Samsung, the system camera series is called...

Panasonic Lumix ZS7 (TZ10) Review

Panasonic Lumix ZS7 (TZ10) Review Panasonic's new top model of compact super-zoom cameras is the new Panasonic Lumix ZS7 (TZ10...
- Advertisement -

Canon PowerShot S110 Review

Canon PowerShot S110 Review The Canon PowerShot S110 is a WLAN camera with manual control and touch display optically zooms...

Panasonic Lumix FZ35 (FZ38) Review

Panasonic Lumix FZ35 (FZ38) Review Panasonic has accepted the challenge of its competitors and is sending the Lumix DMC-FZ35 (FZ38...

Must read

Nikon D100 Review

Nikon D100 Review Those who have always dreamed of continuing...

Leica X Vario (Type 107) Review

Leica X Vario (Type 107) Review: Leica X Vario...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you